Off-campus South Dakota State University users: To download campus access theses, please use the following link to log into our proxy server with your South Dakota State University ID and password.

Non-South Dakota State University users: Please talk to your librarian about requesting this thesis through interlibrary loan.

Document Type

Thesis - University Access Only

Award Date

1996

Degree Name

Master of Science (MS)

Department / School

Wildlife and Fisheries Science

First Advisor

Kenneth F. Higgens

Abstract

Considerable attention has been given to the quality of aerial surveys of spring breeding duck populations and water conditions in the prairie pothole region. In contrast, little research time has been done in relation to validating the quality of the July aerial brood surveys which do not have a ground-truth compliment similar to the spring breeding population survey. Four ground survey periods along 9 Air-Ground Comparison segments were used to evaluate the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) Aerial Waterfowl Production and Habitat Survey (production survey) in eastern South Dakota. Survey 1 was conducted before and Survey 2 was conducted during the production survey, while Surveys 3 and 4 were conducted after the production survey. During this study, broods and Late Nesting Index (LNI) adults were counted from the ground and air. The LNI is composed of lone drakes in breeding plumage and duck pairs and is used to predict the relative number of broods that hatch after the production survey is concluded. We counted the greatest number of broods during ground survey 3 which was I month after the USFWS production survey. Survey 3 brood counts showed the best relationship to the total number of broods produced on the comparison segments. Based on our ground counts, the most broods along the study segments would have theoretically been present during late July through early August. July pond count data showed a better relationship to the number of broods that hatched after the production survey than did data from the Aerial-LNI or Ground-LNI. Our findings along with data from earlier studies indicate that enough discrepancy exists between the timing of current aerial brood surveys and the peak in brood occurrence to merit consideration of further evaluation of the USFWS brood survey protocols.

Library of Congress Subject Headings

Waterfowl--Breeding--South Dakota
Waterfowl--South Dakota--Statistics

Description

Includes bibliographical references (pages 77-81)

Format

application/pdf

Number of Pages

115

Publisher

South Dakota State University

Rights

Copyright © 1996. Thomas R. Cooper. All rights reserved.

Share

COinS