Off-campus South Dakota State University users: To download campus access theses, please use the following link to log into our proxy server with your South Dakota State University ID and password.
Non-South Dakota State University users: Please talk to your librarian about requesting this thesis through interlibrary loan.
Thesis - University Access Only
Master of Science (MS)
Wildlife and Fisheries Science
Daniel E. Hubbard
In many localities winter food plots of corn am/or sorghum are used to enhance the over-winter survival of ring-necked pheasants. Yet, few studies have been conducted evaluating the benefits provided by winter diets of com and/or sorghum to pheasants. 1be gut morphology and body condition of 110 pen-reared hen pheasants fed ad libitum and restricted (112, 147, 173 kcal/bird/day) corn and sorghum diets were evaluated in the winters of 1990-91 and 1991-92.Durinq the same winters, in eastern south Dakota, the gut morphology and body condition of 98 wild hen peasants collected from areas containing food plots of com, sorghum, com/sorghum, and from areas without food plots were also evaluated. Intestinal size and body condition did not differ between ad libitum diets in pen experiments. Fed restricted diets, there were few differences in gut size or condition between diets within rations. Between rations, all diets combined intestinal weights were largest on 147 kcal/bird/day rations, but intestinal lengths were longest on 112 kcal/bird/day rations suggesting a biphasic response of these organs to variations in diet quality. Wild hens consuming wild foods or soybeans had lower fat reserves and larger guts than hens consuming com or sorghum grains indicating a lower quality diet. Wild foods are low in energy content and high in fiber, while soybeans contain trypsin; a digestive inhibitor that lowers the metabolizable energy content of the diet. Wild hens collected from areas without food plots had larger intestines and lower fat reserves than hens collected from areas with food plots both winters. Hens without food plots had crops 75-85% wild foods and soybeans both winters. Hens shot from sorghum plots had larger intestines and lower fat reserves than hens shot from corn or corn/sorghum food plots, but hens from sorghum plots seldom fed in sorghum plots. When supplying adequate winter food is the goal of management managers should feel free to plant either corn or sorghum in winter food plots for pheasants, but soybeans may be a poor choice because of the digestive inhibitor they contain.
Library of Congress Subject Headings
Ring-necked pheasant--South Dakota--Feeding and feedsRing-necked pheasant--South Dakota--Wintering
Corn as feed
Sorghum as feed
Includes bibliographical references (pages 49-53)
Number of Pages
South Dakota State University
Copyright 1989 Todd R. Bogenschutz. All Rights Reserved.
Bogenschutz, Todd R., "An Evaluation of Corn and Sorghum as a Winter Food Source for Ring-necked Pheasants" (1992). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 298.