Document Type


Publication Date



Economic threshold, geostatistics, incremental yield loss, kriging, precision agriculture, site-specific weed management


Weeds generally occur in patches in production fields. Are these patches spatially and temporally stable? Do management recommendations change on the basis of these data? The population density and location of annual grass weeds and common ragweed were examined in a 65-ha corn/soybean production field from 1995 to 2004. Yearly treatment recommendations were developed from field means, medians, and kriging grid cell densities, using the hyperbolic yield loss (YL) equation and published incremental YL values (I ), maximum YL values (A), and YL limits of 5, 10, or 15%. Mean plant densities ranged from 12 to 131 annual grasses m22 and , 1 to 37 common ragweed m22. Median weed densities ranged from 0 to 40 annual grasses m22 and were 0 for common ragweed. The grass I values used to estimate corn YL were 0.1 and 2% and treatment was recommended in only 1 yr when the high I value and either the mean or median density was used. The grass I values used for soybean were 0.7 and 10% and estimated YL was over 10% all years, regardless of I value. The common ragweed I values were 4.5 and 6% for corn and 5.1 and 15.6% for soybean. On the basis of mean densities, fieldwide treatment would have been recommended in 6 of 9 yr but in no years when the median density was used. Recommendations on the basis of grid cell weed density and kriging ranged from . 80% of the field treated for grass weeds in 3 of 4 yr in soybean to , 20% of the field treated for common ragweed in 2002 and 2004 (corn). Grass patches were more stable in time, space, and density than common ragweed patches. Population densities and spatial distribution generally were variable enough so that site-specific information within this field would improve weed management decisions.

Publication Title

Weed Science



First Page


Last Page






DOI of Published Version



Weed Science Society of America


Works produced by employees of the U.S. Government as part of their official duties are not copyrighted within the U.S.


This article was published in (2016) Weed Science, 54(2), 380-390. doi:10.1614/WS-05-090R1.1

Included in

Weed Science Commons