Document Type
Article
Publication Date
7-2007
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the relationship between bone geometry and onset of walking in former term and preterm children.
STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 128 preschool children aged 3 to 5 years who underwent peripheral quantitative computerized tomography measures of bone size at the distal tibia. Linear models were developed, stratifying by sex, to determine whether bone differences between children born term and preterm were caused by differences in walking age.
RESULTS: Children with a history of preterm birth walked later than children born at term (12.4 +/- 0.5 versus 10.9 +/- 0.2 months; P = .004); however, gestation-corrected walking age (11.4 +/- 0.5 for children born preterm) did not differ. In multiple regression analysis, boys born preterm had larger periosteal and endosteal circumferences and smaller cortical thickness and area than boys born term (least square means, 49.7 +/- 1.3 mm, 43.0 +/- 1.8 mm, 1.1 +/- 0.11 mm, and 49.3 +/- 3.2 mm2 versus 47.0 +/- 0.5 mm, 38.5 +/- 0.7 mm, 1.4 +/- 0.04 mm, and 56.9 +/- 1.2 mm2, respectively; all P < .05). Preterm birth remained statistically significant after adding the age of walking to the models, but no longer significant when current activity levels were included.
CONCLUSION: Greater periosteal and endosteal circumferences, with smaller cortical bone thickness and area, were found in former preterm boys, but not girls, and were explained by differences in current activity levels, not age of walking.
Publication Title
The Journal of Pediatrics
Volume
151
Issue
1
First Page
61
Last Page
66
Format
application/pdf
Language
en
DOI of Published Version
10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.02.033
PMID
17586192
Publisher
Mosby
Recommended Citation
Samra, Haifa Abou and Specker, Bonny, "Walking Age Does Not Explain Term Versus Preterm Difference in Bone Geometry" (2007). Ethel Austin Martin Program Publications. 48.
https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/eam_pubs/48
Comments
This is the NIH Public Access Authors Manuscript. The version of record was published in (2007) The Journal of Pediatrics,151(1),61-66.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.02.033.