Title

Is Eating Locally a Moral Obligation

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

4-2013

Abstract

Advocates of eating locally offer a wide range of arguments in favor of the practice, but their ethical import is not always clear. Some locavore statements and arguments seem to imply a strong form of moral obligation; that eating locally is not merely instrumental to some other good, but has intrinsic value in its own right. This article examines standard arguments on behalf of eating locally, including arguments linked to the value of small farms and agrarianism, the environment, taste and health, trust, and relational markets. Most arguments put forward on behalf of eating locally value it instrumentally, the main exception being arguments based on relational markets. Although these arguments provide important motives for eating locally, the strength of obligation varies widely, and even the strongest arguments possess significant qualifications. While eating locally can play a role in reducing environmental impacts, this is not necessarily so, and once removed from instrumental considerations, eating locally is more likely at best an imperfect duty.

Publication Title

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics

Volume

26

Issue

2

First Page

421

Last Page

437

DOI of Published Version

10.1007/s10806-012-9397-8

Publisher

Springer Netherlands

Link to Full Text

Share

COinS