Faculty Mentor

Patricia Ahmed


Underage drinking is a huge problem in the United States. Rational choice and deterrence theories suggest that the best way to deal with the problem is to create and enforce strict laws against underage drinking. However, are these truly effective mechanisms in this regard? This paper explores these issues by analyzing underage alcohol consumption patterns in three sets of states classified as “lax”, “strict” and “typical” in terms of their underage drinking laws using data from the 2012 National Survey of Drug Use and Health (NSDUH). T-tests did not show significant differences between underage alcohol use and binge drinking in the six randomly sampled typical states, strict states and the national averages. T-test suggested that alcohol use in the lax states was somewhat lower than the national average. Logistic regression results did not show a significant difference in the rates of underage alcohol use and binge drinking across the three different categories. They do, however, show a slight decrease in underage drinking over time, holding state type constant. The findings suggest that perhaps tougher laws, in and of themselves, do little to address this problem of underage alcohol consumption.



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.