Document Type

Data set

Publication Date

5-2023

Abstract

We used camera data for three sympatric species black-tailed jackrabbits (Lepus californicus), kit foxes (Vulpes macrotis), and pronghorns (Antilocapra americana) to evaluate the influence of competing image classification approaches on estimates of occupancy and inferences about space use. We classified images with: (i) single review (manual), (ii) double review (manual by two observers), (iii) an automated-manual review (machine learning to cull empty images and single review of remaining images), (iv) a pre-trained machine-learning algorithm that classifies images to species (base model), (v) the base model accepting only classifications with ≥95% confidence, (vi) the base model trained with regional images (trained model), and (vii) the trained model accepting only classifications with ≥95% confidence. We compared species-specific results from alternative approaches to results from double review, which reduces the potential for misclassifications and was assumed to be the best approximation of truth.

The zip file (2MB) contains the following files:
READ_ME.txt
Image_Classifications_by_Approach.csv
Detection_Covariates.csv
SamplingArea_Covariate.csv
Site_Covariates_Jackrabbit.csv
Site_Covariates_KitFox.csv
Site_Covariates_Pronghorn.csv

Share

COinS